Forms of government

Thinker

Thomas Hobbes

England, seventeenth century

Hobbes argued that a sovereign with broad powers can end a condition of mutual insecurity.

Historical context

Hobbes wrote amid seventeenth-century English political conflicts. He published Leviathan in 1651. Security and fear of violence structure his account of civil authority.

Overview

If rival bodies can each appeal to final authority, a dispute over powers may become a security problem again. Hobbes defends the unity of the sovereign’s essential powers and allows an assembly to hold them.

Main claims

Sovereign authority must be able to settle disputes in the last instance to sustain civil peace.

Undivided sovereignty

Dividing the sovereign’s essential powers undermines its ability to preserve peace.

Interpretation for comparison · Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Constitutional limits

The sovereign has no civil superior authorised to enforce a covenant against it.

Interpretation for comparison · Hobbes’s Moral and Political Philosophy · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Debates and nuances

Hobbesian sovereignty can reside in an assembly. Its relation to self-preservation limits what can be demanded of a subject.

The assessment compares only the positions documented in this entry.